Comments on: The Mystery of the Montauk Monster http://cjlevinson.com/2008/08/01/the-mystery-of-the-montauk-monster/ The Blog of CJ Levinson Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:42:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: museditions http://cjlevinson.com/2008/08/01/the-mystery-of-the-montauk-monster/#comment-6831 Fri, 08 Aug 2008 07:58:15 +0000 http://cjwriter.wordpress.com/?p=737#comment-6831 If you’re still interested in the beastie, this story was all over the US news today:
“The saga of the so-called Montauk Monster appears to have taken another bizarre turn, this time toward Hollywood, with the Web site of a movie production crew claiming to have the “kidnapped” carcas.”

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,399803,00.html

I don’t think I want to see this film…

CJ: Interesting! That would go with what people are thinking; either a dog or a hoax, and certainly this Splinterheads director sounds like he’s all but claimed it’s his creation.

There are still a few unanswered questions, though. Why would a film which is basically a comedy set in a carnival have monsters in it? And why has this only just been reported? It was up on the website days ago; if Darren and Rachel Goldberg are related, why has it taken so long to work out?

Hoax sounds like the most likely answer but I’m still not sure how it fits in with this particularly movie. Maybe we won’t know until it opens next year.

]]> By: B0bbyG http://cjlevinson.com/2008/08/01/the-mystery-of-the-montauk-monster/#comment-6830 Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:20:04 +0000 http://cjwriter.wordpress.com/?p=737#comment-6830 Poor thing. I’m sure that’s a dog. It doesn’t really look like anything else.

I’m a ghost, apparently. I didn’t think much of question 4 though, because I couldn’t imagine doing any of those things to someone. I’m much more forgiving than that!

CJ: I’ve seen a few more pictures now; if it’s real I think it has to be a dog. The shape and size seem like the closest match and who knows how long its body was in the water? Apparently they still can’t find it, though… the longer it goes on the more likely it’s a hoax, I would think.

Hm, three ghosts… I’m starting to think my blog might be haunted! I agree with you about question 4, though, it’s pretty hard to imagine yourself in that situation, isn’t it? BlogThings asks the weirdest questions sometimes.

]]> By: EdithKeeler http://cjlevinson.com/2008/08/01/the-mystery-of-the-montauk-monster/#comment-6829 Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:45:50 +0000 http://cjwriter.wordpress.com/?p=737#comment-6829 I came for the turtle-without-a-shell. I stayed for the great writing and interesting topics. I’ve been back several times since and I’ve bookmarked you. Cheers.

CJ: Hi Edith, thank you for the lovely comment. I’m glad you enjoyed the posts and my writing; it’s still evolving and I appreciate your feedback. It’s just what I needed to hear at the moment, so thank you so much.

]]> By: Craig Grant http://cjlevinson.com/2008/08/01/the-mystery-of-the-montauk-monster/#comment-6828 Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:55:18 +0000 http://cjwriter.wordpress.com/?p=737#comment-6828 The Monster of Montauk mystery SOLVED!
I found another archived photo and solved this mystery
http://craigrant.com/2008/08/02/montauk-monster-mystery-solved-by-craig-grant/

CJ: So you think it’s one of the Anunnaki, Craig? Last time I checked it still looked like a dog to me rather than an ancient Babylon God! But I’d happily be proved wrong. :)

]]> By: Osama http://cjlevinson.com/2008/08/01/the-mystery-of-the-montauk-monster/#comment-6827 Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:56:49 +0000 http://cjwriter.wordpress.com/?p=737#comment-6827 Yeah, you’re right. It’s most like a dog … poor ugly dog :(

CJ: A dog’s what most people seem to think now; hopefully it will be identified before too long. I feel really sorry for it now… poor thing.

]]>